Bea.AI coding blog
  • Tree
    • Tree Traverse
    • Iteration based traverse
    • Typical problems and solutions
      • Max width of binary tree
      • Binary Tree & BST Serialize & Deserialize
      • Lowest common ancestor (LCA) for Binary Tree and BST
      • Subproblem-based Approach for Resolving Max Value on Trees
      • Path sum III
  • Graph
  • Data structure
    • Java data structure
  • Algorithm general templates
    • Tree
    • Trie
    • Graph
  • Java Algorithm Tips and Tricks
    • Java concurrent list
  • Coding patterns & Strategies
  • Coding patterns & template
    • 1. Binary Search
    • 2. Two Pointer
    • 3. Sliding Window
    • 4. Backtracking
    • 5. DFS
    • 6. BFS
    • 7. Stack
    • 8. Heap
    • 9. Prefix Sum
    • 10. Linked List
    • 11. BST
    • 12. Line sweep
    • 14. Tree
    • 15. Graph
    • 16. Bit manipulation
    • 17. Matrix
    • 18. Monotonic Stack
    • 19. Sorting
    • 20. Union Find
    • 21. Trie
    • 22. Dynamic programming
    • 23. Customized Data Structure
  • Code interview steps
  • Leetcode
    • Tree
      • Traversal
      • Construction and Conversion
      • Search and Validation
      • Manipulation and Modification
      • Special Trees
      • Miscellaneous
    • Dynamic programing
      • Classic DP Problems
      • Sequence/Array DP
      • Matrix DP
      • Knapsack Problems
      • String DP
      • Tree/Graph DP
      • Optimization Problems
      • Combinatorial DP
    • DFS
      • Graph Traversal
      • Path Finding
      • Tree Traversal
      • Backtracking
      • Topological Sorting
      • Traversal Order
      • Dynamic Programming with DFS
      • Connected Components
    • BFS
      • Graph
      • Tree
      • Matrix
      • String
      • Others
    • Two points
      • Array
      • String
      • Linked List
      • Sorting
      • Others
    • LinkedList
      • Basic Operations
      • Cycle Detection and Handling
      • Intersection and Union
      • Partitioning and Merging
      • Palindrome
      • Miscellaneous
    • Backtracking
    • Binary Search
    • Union Find
    • Trie
    • Sort
    • Heap
    • Randomness
    • Topological sort
    • Stack
    • HashTable
    • Sliding Window
  • Blind 75
    • Array
    • Binary
    • Dynamic Programming
    • Graph
    • Interval
    • LinkedList
    • Matrix
    • String
    • Tree
    • Heap
  • Companies
    • Apple
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • 1. 0/1 Knapsack
  • 2. Partition Equal Subset Sum
  • 3. Target Sum
  • 4. Coin Change 2
  • 5. Combination Sum IV
  1. Leetcode
  2. Dynamic programing

Knapsack Problems

1. 0/1 Knapsack

  1. The problem:

The 0/1 Knapsack problem is a classic dynamic programming problem. Given a set of items, each with a weight and a value, and a knapsack that has a maximum weight capacity, determine the maximum value that can be obtained by including certain items in the knapsack. The constraint is that once an item is included, it cannot be included again.

Problem link on LeetCode: https://leetcode.com/problems/01-knapsack/

  1. Optimal Java code for the 0/1 Knapsack problem:

public class Solution {
    public int knapSack(int W, int[] weights, int[] values) {
        int n = weights.length;
        int[][] dp = new int[n + 1][W + 1];

        for (int i = 1; i <= n; i++) {
            for (int j = 1; j <= W; j++) {
                if (weights[i - 1] <= j) {
                    dp[i][j] = Math.max(dp[i - 1][j], values[i - 1] + dp[i - 1][j - weights[i - 1]]);
                } else {
                    dp[i][j] = dp[i - 1][j];
                }
            }
        }

        return dp[n][W];
    }
}
  1. Algorithm explanation and interview insights:

To solve the 0/1 Knapsack problem optimally, we can use a dynamic programming approach.

In the given solution, W represents the maximum weight capacity of the knapsack, weights is an array of item weights, and values is an array of item values. The goal is to determine the maximum value that can be obtained with the given constraints.

The solution uses a 2D array dp to store the maximum value that can be obtained for different combinations of items and weights. The row i represents the available items so far and the column j represents the current weight capacity.

The algorithm iterates through all possible combinations of items and weights. At each iteration, it checks if the weight of the current item weights[i - 1] is less than or equal to the current weight capacity j. If it is, it considers two choices:

  1. Exclude the current item: dp[i][j] = dp[i - 1][j]

  2. Include the current item: dp[i][j] = values[i - 1] + dp[i - 1][j - weights[i - 1]]

The solution takes the maximum value of these two choices and stores it in dp[i][j]. If the weight of the current item is greater than the current weight capacity, the current item cannot be included, so the solution takes the same value as the previous row dp[i - 1][j].

Finally, the solution returns the maximum value that can be obtained by including items.

During the interview process, it's essential to understand the problem statement thoroughly and identify it as a variation of the knapsack problem. Explaining the dynamic programming approach clearly and providing efficient code with detailed comments demonstrates strong problem-solving skills.

Additionally, discussing the time and space complexity of the solution helps showcase the ability to analyze and optimize algorithms.

2. Partition Equal Subset Sum

  1. Problem Description and Link: The problem "Partition Equal Subset Sum" can be found on LeetCode under the following link: https://leetcode.com/problems/partition-equal-subset-sum/

Given a non-empty array nums containing positive integers, we need to determine if it can be partitioned into two subsets such that the sum of elements in both subsets is equal.

  1. Optimized Java Code with Detailed Comments:

class Solution {
    public boolean canPartition(int[] nums) {
        int totalSum = 0;
        for (int num : nums) {
            totalSum += num;
        }
        
        // If total sum is odd, partition is not possible
        if (totalSum % 2 != 0) return false;
        
        int targetSum = totalSum / 2;
        int n = nums.length;
        boolean[][] dp = new boolean[n + 1][targetSum + 1];
        
        // Base case: Sum of 0 can be achieved by not selecting any element
        for (int i = 0; i <= n; i++) {
            dp[i][0] = true;
        }
        
        for (int i = 1; i <= n; i++) {
            for (int j = 1; j <= targetSum; j++) {
                if (nums[i - 1] <= j) {
                    dp[i][j] = dp[i - 1][j] || dp[i - 1][j - nums[i - 1]];
                } else {
                    dp[i][j] = dp[i - 1][j];
                }
            }
        }
        
        return dp[n][targetSum];
    }
}
  1. Algorithm and Thinking Process:

To solve this problem, we can use the dynamic programming approach. The idea is to check if there is a subset of given array elements that sum up to half of the total sum. If such a subset exists, it means the other half subset can also have the same sum, and thus the array can be partitioned equally.

First, we calculate the total sum of the array. If the sum is odd, it is not possible to have equal subsets and we return false.

Next, we set the target sum as half of the total sum because we need to find a subset that has a sum equal to this target.

We initialize a 2D boolean array dp of size n+1 by targetSum+1. dp[i][j] represents whether it is possible to obtain a sum j using the first i elements of the array.

We set the base case where it is possible to achieve a sum of 0 using any number of elements. For any value of i, dp[i][0] will be true.

Then, we iterate through the array elements and the target sum. For each element nums[i-1], we have two choices:

  1. Take the element nums[i-1] and reduce the target sum by that element's value: dp[i][j] = dp[i-1][j-nums[i-1]]

  2. Do not take the element nums[i-1]: dp[i][j] = dp[i-1][j]

We update the dp array accordingly. Finally, we return the value of dp[n][targetSum], which will indicate if it is possible to partition the array into equal subsets.

During an interview, it is important to understand the problem requirements, constraints, and then come up with an approach. The dynamic programming approach is a common technique for solving problems with optimal substructure, and practicing similar problems will help in recognizing the patterns and applying the appropriate algorithms.

3. Target Sum

  1. Problem Description: The problem "Target Sum" asks us to find the number of possible ways to obtain a target sum by applying either addition or subtraction operations on a given set of numbers.

Problem Link: https://leetcode.com/problems/target-sum/

  1. Java Code (with detailed comments):

public class Solution {
    // Helper method to count the number of ways to reach target sum
    private int countWays(int[] nums, int target, int index, int sum, Map<String, Integer> memo){
        // Base case: when we reach the end of the array
        if(index == nums.length){
            // Check if target sum is reached
            if(sum == target){
                return 1; // Target sum is reached
            } else {
                return 0; // Target sum is not reached
            }
        }
        
        // Generate unique key for the current state using index and sum
        String key = index + "-" + sum;
        
        // Check if result for current state is already memoized
        if(memo.containsKey(key)){
            return memo.get(key);
        }
        
        // Apply addition operation on the current element and recursively calculate the count
        int add = countWays(nums, target, index+1, sum + nums[index], memo);
        
        // Apply subtraction operation on the current element and recursively calculate the count
        int subtract = countWays(nums, target, index+1, sum - nums[index], memo);
        
        // Calculate the total count for current state
        int totalCount = add + subtract;
        
        // Store the count in memo for future reference
        memo.put(key, totalCount);
        
        return totalCount;
    }
    
    public int findTargetSumWays(int[] nums, int target) {
        // Create a memoization map to store already computed results
        Map<String, Integer> memo = new HashMap<>();
        
        // Start the recursion from index 0 and sum 0
        return countWays(nums, target, 0, 0, memo);
    }
}
  1. Detailed Description:

The problem "Target Sum" can be solved using a depth-first search (DFS) approach. The brute-force solution would involve trying out all possible combinations of addition and subtraction operations on the given set of numbers to find the target sum. However, this approach would have an exponential time complexity.

To optimize the solution, we can use memoization to avoid redundant computations. We start by defining a helper method countWays that takes the set of numbers, the target sum, the current index, the current sum, and a memoization map as parameters. This method returns the number of ways to reach the target sum.

In the countWays method, we check the base case where we reach the end of the array. If the current sum is equal to the target sum, we have found a valid way to reach the target sum, so we return 1. Otherwise, if we reach the end of the array without reaching the target sum, we return 0.

We generate a unique key for the current state using the index and the sum. This key helps us memoize the results of already computed states. We check if the result for the current state is already memoized. If yes, we return the memoized result.

If the result is not memoized, we recursively call the countWays method for two cases: adding the current element and subtracting the current element. By doing this, we consider all possible combinations of addition and subtraction operations. We calculate the total count for the current state by summing up the counts from the addition and subtraction cases.

Finally, we store the total count in the memoization map using the generated key for future reference.

In the findTargetSumWays method, we create a memoization map and start the recursion from the first element of the array with a sum of 0. This method returns the final result, which is the total number of ways to reach the target sum.

During an interview, it's important to emphasize the approach of using memoization to optimize runtime complexity. Explain how the memoization technique helps avoid redundant computations and improve the efficiency of the solution. Additionally, discuss the time and space complexity of the solution, which are both O(N * target), where N is the length of the input array and target is the given target sum.

4. Coin Change 2

  1. Problem Description and Leetcode Link: The problem "Coin Change 2" on Leetcode asks us to find the number of combinations that can be formed using a given set of coins to make a specific amount.

Leetcode Link: https://leetcode.com/problems/coin-change-2/

  1. Optimized Java Code for "Coin Change 2" with Detailed Comments: Here's the optimized Java code for the problem "Coin Change 2" with detailed comments:

class Solution {
    public int change(int amount, int[] coins) {
        // Create a DP table to store the number of combinations for each amount
        int[] dp = new int[amount + 1];
        dp[0] = 1;  // There is always one way to make amount = 0

        // Iterate through all coins
        for (int coin : coins) {
            // For each coin, calculate the number of combinations for each amount
            for (int i = coin; i <= amount; i++) {
                // Add the combinations for the remaining amount after taking this coin
                dp[i] += dp[i - coin];
            }
        }
        
        return dp[amount];
    }
}
  1. Detailed Description of the Algorithm and Interview Process: The problem "Coin Change 2" can be solved using a dynamic programming approach. The main idea is to use a DP table to store the number of combinations for each amount.

First, we create a DP table of size amount + 1, initialized with zeros. The index of the DP table represents the amount, and the value at each index represents the number of combinations to make that amount.

Since there is always one way to make amount = 0 (by not choosing any coin), we set dp[0] = 1.

Next, we iterate through all the given coins. For each coin, we calculate the number of combinations for each amount i from coin to amount.

To calculate the number of combinations for a specific amount, we add the number of combinations for the remaining amount after taking this coin (dp[i - coin]) to the existing number of combinations (dp[i]).

In other words, for each coin, we are trying to see how many new combinations we can form by using that coin. We keep updating the DP table as we iterate through the coins.

Finally, the answer is stored in dp[amount], which represents the number of combinations to make the given amount using the given coins.

During an interview, it is essential to explain the algorithm clearly and mention the time complexity of the solution. The time complexity of this solution is O(amount * n), where amount is the target amount and n is the number of coins. This is because we iterate through the entire DP table for each coin.

It's also important to test the code with various test cases, including edge cases, to ensure its correctness and efficiency.

Overall, by providing a well-explained and optimized solution, along with the algorithm's detailed description, you can demonstrate your problem-solving skills and coding expertise during an interview.

5. Combination Sum IV

  1. Problem Description: The problem "Combination Sum IV" on LeetCode asks to find the number of possible combinations that can be formed using the given list of numbers to reach the target sum.

  1. Optimized Java Code:

public class CombinationSumIV {
    public int combinationSum4(int[] nums, int target) {
        int[] dp = new int[target + 1];
        dp[0] = 1;

        for (int i = 1; i <= target; i++) {
            for (int num : nums) {
                if (i >= num) {
                    dp[i] += dp[i - num];
                }
            }
        }

        return dp[target];
    }
}
  1. Algorithm Explanation and Thinking Process:

  • In this problem, we are given a list of positive numbers nums and a target number target.

  • The goal is to find the number of unique combinations that can be formed using the numbers from nums to reach the target target.

  • We need to return the count of all possible combinations.

Approach:

  • We will use the dynamic programming approach to solve this problem.

  • Let's define dp[i] as the number of combinations that can be formed to make the sum i.

  • To calculate dp[i], we can iterate through the numbers in nums and check how many combinations we can form using the previous results.

  • For each number num in nums, if i >= num, it means that we can form a new combination by adding num to the sum i, and the number of combinations that can be formed will be updated as dp[i] += dp[i - num].

  • We need to continue this process for all numbers in nums and for all sums from 1 to target.

  • Finally, we return dp[target] as the result, which represents the number of possible combinations that can be formed to reach the target sum.

Thinking through it during an interview:

  1. Understand the problem clearly: Read and understand the problem description, constraints, and examples provided.

  2. Identify the problem pattern: Recognize that this problem can be solved using the dynamic programming approach. It involves finding the number of combinations, which is a common pattern for dynamic programming problems.

  3. Define the recursive relation: Break down the problem into smaller subproblems by finding the relationship between the current problem and its subproblems. In this case, dp[i] represents the number of combinations that can be formed to make the sum i.

  4. Plan the approach: Formulate the approach based on the recursive relation. In this problem, we can use a bottom-up dynamic programming approach, where we iteratively calculate dp[i] using the previous results.

  5. Implement the code: Translate the approach into code, making sure to handle edge cases, initialize variables appropriately, and use proper data structures.

  6. Test and debug: Validate the code by running it on various test cases, including the provided examples. Debug any implementation errors or logical issues.

  7. Analyze the complexity: Assess the time and space complexity of the implemented solution. In this case, the time complexity is O(target * nums.length) as we iterate over target and nums, and the space complexity is O(target) for dp array.

By following these steps, you can effectively tackle the "Combination Sum IV" problem on LeetCode and similar problems during technical interviews.

PreviousMatrix DPNextString DP

Last updated 1 year ago

LeetCode Problem Link:

Combination Sum IV